Dualism: Difference between revisions

From AnthroWiki
(Created page with "'''Dualism''' is a philosophical system that bases all world events on two fundamentally different and non-reducible principles, such as good and evil,...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Dualism''' is a [[Philosophy|philosophical]] system that bases all world events on two fundamentally different and non-reducible principles, such as [[good]] and [[evil]], this [[world]] and the [[otherworld]], or [[spirit]] and [[matter]].  
'''Dualism''' is a [[Philosophy|philosophical]] system that bases all world events on two fundamentally different and non-reducible principles, such as [[good]] and [[evil]], this [[world]] and the [[otherworld]], or [[spirit]] and [[matter]].  
== Historical background ==
The origin of dualism lies in the [[ancient Persian culture]], which was characterised by the constant struggle between two spiritual entities. [[Ahura Mazda]], the god of [[light]], was opposed by [[Ahriman]], the spirit of [[darkness]]. They were, however, twins who had sprung from [[Zurvan]] and [[Zeruane Akarene]], respectively, the "uncreated time". So there was still an awareness of the common origin. This continued as ethical-religious dualism in post-Christian times in [[Manichaeism]], which sees world events as determined by the struggle between good and evil.
The contrast between spirit and matter was felt particularly strongly by the [[intellectual and mind soul]] that developed in the [[Greco-Latin period]]. [[Mythology]] was replaced by [[philosophy]] and with it the essential struggle between the gods receded into the background. The difference between one's own [[thinking]] activity and the externally perceived [[world of the senses]] was now felt much more strongly. Already [[w:Anaxagoras|Anaxagoras]] distinguished between the passive substance, fragmented into a chaotic multiplicity, and the actively ordering uniform impersonal principle of the [[world spirit]], the [[Nous]] ({{Greek|νοῦς}}). [[w:Plato|Plato]] contrasted the world of sense with the world of [[idea]]s, and [[w:Aristotle|Aristotle]] distinguished between [[substance]] and [[form]] or [[act]] and [[potency]]. In the ethical dualism of the Stoics, the strictly causal natural order was opposed to the moral [[freedom]] of [[man]].
In modern times, with the growing [[I-consciousness]] of the dawning [[consciousness-soul age]], the gap felt between the [[I]] and the [[world]] became even greater. [[René Descartes]] made a strict distinction between the [[res extensa]] and the [[res cogitans]]. His interactionist substance dualism sharpened the [[mind-body problem]] that still confronts [[science]] with seemingly insoluble problems today.


== Literature ==
== Literature ==

Revision as of 08:51, 1 October 2021

Dualism is a philosophical system that bases all world events on two fundamentally different and non-reducible principles, such as good and evil, this world and the otherworld, or spirit and matter.

Historical background

The origin of dualism lies in the ancient Persian culture, which was characterised by the constant struggle between two spiritual entities. Ahura Mazda, the god of light, was opposed by Ahriman, the spirit of darkness. They were, however, twins who had sprung from Zurvan and Zeruane Akarene, respectively, the "uncreated time". So there was still an awareness of the common origin. This continued as ethical-religious dualism in post-Christian times in Manichaeism, which sees world events as determined by the struggle between good and evil.

The contrast between spirit and matter was felt particularly strongly by the intellectual and mind soul that developed in the Greco-Latin period. Mythology was replaced by philosophy and with it the essential struggle between the gods receded into the background. The difference between one's own thinking activity and the externally perceived world of the senses was now felt much more strongly. Already Anaxagoras distinguished between the passive substance, fragmented into a chaotic multiplicity, and the actively ordering uniform impersonal principle of the world spirit, the Nous (Greekνοῦς). Plato contrasted the world of sense with the world of ideas, and Aristotle distinguished between substance and form or act and potency. In the ethical dualism of the Stoics, the strictly causal natural order was opposed to the moral freedom of man.

In modern times, with the growing I-consciousness of the dawning consciousness-soul age, the gap felt between the I and the world became even greater. René Descartes made a strict distinction between the res extensa and the res cogitans. His interactionist substance dualism sharpened the mind-body problem that still confronts science with seemingly insoluble problems today.

Literature

References to the work of Rudolf Steiner follow Rudolf Steiner's Collected Works (CW or GA), Rudolf Steiner Verlag, Dornach/Switzerland, unless otherwise stated.
Email: verlag@steinerverlag.com URL: www.steinerverlag.com.
Index to the Complete Works of Rudolf Steiner - Aelzina Books
A complete list by Volume Number and a full list of known English translations you may also find at Rudolf Steiner's Collected Works
Rudolf Steiner Archive - The largest online collection of Rudolf Steiner's books, lectures and articles in English.
Rudolf Steiner Audio - Recorded and Read by Dale Brunsvold
steinerbooks.org - Anthroposophic Press Inc. (USA)
Rudolf Steiner Handbook - Christian Karl's proven standard work for orientation in Rudolf Steiner's Collected Works for free download as PDF.